Sound Off: No More Parking

Last week we asked if parking is less important for urban multifamily as TOD grows in popularity and Atlanta-based Ackerman & Co associate Evan Ziegler answered. He says reduced parking is a great way to lower costs for the builder/developer, which means reducing rents/purchase price for the user. (Access to public transit also means users don’t have the costs of car ownership.) And the change in capital costs could make deals more feasible, while fitting more units on a given lot. The problem is parking’s chicken/egg situation, he says. People don’t want to reduce parking because walkability and transit are subpar, but nobody’s building out transit because everything is so spread out and car-focused. Let the debate continue.

Continue reading this story with a free account

Log in or register
Sign up for more articles like this
Subscribe to Bisnow's National Newsletters
Related Stories

Midterms Results: What We Know So Far About CRE's Shake-Out

U.S. Hotel RevPAR Surges 7% In Q3, But Expect Easing From Here

Stock Sell-Off, Bond Market Jitters Signal Financing Trouble For AI Data Centers

Suburban D.C. County Weighs Microhousing As Affordability Salve

Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac Rewrite Underwriting Standards For NYC's Rent Freeze

Starwood Launches Residential Land JV Targeting $1B In Annual Originations

RealPage Antitrust Case Ends With Nearly $360M In Settlements For Renters

ZOM Living Entity Files For Bankruptcy To Fund Fight To Overturn $323M Judgment

How Colliers Engineering Helped A Struggling Dam Move To The Head Of The Class

Golden Apartment Building Sells For $62M To Chicago Company

Real Estate's Bottom Rung Is Getting Harder To Reach — And Now It Wants AI Skills

New Student Housing Towers Lease Up Quickly In University City, But Developers Can't Build More