Still In Bankruptcy, Forever 21 De-Emphasizing Physical Stores

Bankrupt retailer Forever 21 Inc. is setting its sights on e-commerce sales outside the United States, where consumer spending is rising rapidly.

In partnership with international e-commerce platform Global-e, Forever 21 has revived its international e-commerce site, Pacific Business News reports. Its goal will be to reach consumers in the Asia-Pacific region, where spending power is predicted to rise dramatically in the coming years, as well as in Latin America and Canada.

As Forever 21 ramps up its online business, its brick-and-mortar presence is shrinking. At the time of its Chapter 11 bankruptcy in September, Forever 21 said it planned to close as many as 178 U.S. stores, along with many of its stores in Asia and Europe, though the U.S. total was later modified to about 111.

The Los Angeles-based fast-fashion retailer obtained $275M in financing from existing lenders, as well as $75M in new capital to facilitate its restructuring efforts.

Retailers like Forever 21 have been struggling with a major decline in spending on clothes among Americans. Over the last 40 years, U.S. household apparel spending has dropped by half, from 6.2% of disposable income to 3.1%, Retail Dive reports, citing Bureau of Labor Statistics data.

Besides Forever 21, a good many other fashion retailers filed for bankruptcy in 2019, including Charming Charlies, Charlotte Russ and Gymboree, as well as  the massive liquidation of Payless ShoeSource.

The bankruptcies are part of a wider winnowing for the retail industry. According to Coresight Research, 9,302 U.S. store closures were announced in 2019 as of mid-December, up from 5,844 closures in 2018. But store openings for the year were also up, with 4,392 announced as of mid-December 2019, as opposed to 3,258 openings during 2018.

In a separate development for Forever 21, an Alabama mall owner has filed a lawsuit against the bankrupt retailer, alleging that Forever 21 lied about sales projections for a store it opened at the Eastern Shore Centre in suburban Mobile, the Los Angeles Times reports.

The landlord, Allied Development, agreed to allow Forever 21 to pay a percentage of gross monthly sales as rent, based on what the suit asserts were misleading estimates of those sales. The retailer promised at least $6M in sales in its first year, but actually tallied only $1.6M, the suit alleges.

The plaintiff is asking for damages of at least $2.1M, along with $6M in punitive damages. Forever 21 has moved to dismiss the suit.

Continue reading this story with a free account

Log in or register
Sign up for more articles like this
Subscribe to Bisnow's National Newsletters
Related Stories

The Bridge-To-Bridge Bet Is Holding Off CRE's 'Day Of Reckoning' — For Now

Augmentation, Not Replacement: How AI Platforms Are Streamlining Front Desk Teams

Lawmakers Punt On Stripping Approvals From 15 Projects In Data Center Alley

Success Of Top-Tier Malls Masks Enduring Distress In Sector's Underbelly

HUD Launches Investigation Into Wells Fargo's Efforts To Support Black Homeownership

Holographic Zoo Leases 51K SF Coconut Grove Building For First Location

Delaware Statutory Trust Fundraising Jumps 27% From 2025

Hines Spends $170.5M On Mixed-Use Portfolio In Dallas' Bishop Arts District

Bank OZK Shares Drop After Citi Flags $915M Mortgage Concern

Local Investor Pays $30M For Block 37 In Heart Of Downtown Chicago

Soaring Yields Strand REITs In M&A No-Man's-Land

How UK Investment Giant L&G Plans To Grow Its U.S. Multifamily Holdings