'Cars To Casas' Can't Combat Construction Costs

Construction costs of over $700 per SF are one of the several roadblocks making housing construction in San Francisco a continued struggle for developers, according to a recent feasibility study presented to the city’s Board of Supervisors Land Use and Transportation Committee.

The study analyzed Mayor London Breed’s 2021 “Cars to Casas” ordinance proposal, which aimed to address the city’s housing shortages by converting parcels of land formerly zoned for vehicles into new housing developments.

While the report noted that around 500 parcels of land would be eligible for redevelopment, it also found that costs would ultimately make any new development unlikely to happen at all, The Real Deal reported.

The study was conducted by real estate consulting firm Century Urban, following a request by the Board of Supervisors. The study noted that in 16 hypothetical scenarios, none would result in new housing, due to the financial and economic constraints.

“Since all prototypes analyzed indicated negative per-unit residual values, the evidence indicates that there is not only no revenue available for purchase of land but also that the ordinance does not create surplus value to dedicate to new or increased exactions or other requirements.”

The report did note that in more expensive districts like Marina or Russian Hill, the overall feasibility of construction profitability increased, as those neighborhoods can generally charge higher rent. Housing construction built on a for-sale basis generally fared better in terms of feasibility according to the report, but still suffered.

“While all prototypes were shown infeasible under the cost, regulatory and revenue factors, prototypes for both small and larger lots are much closer to feasibility in pricier neighborhoods given the higher rents and sales prices and consistent costs and requirements in all neighborhoods,” according to the report.

San Francisco has struggled to find a way to streamline its housing development roadblocks, with two competing ballot measures aimed at easing the problem both failing at the polls this past election.

The measure must pass out of the committee and be approved by the Board of Supervisors to go into effect, but has stalled repeatedly since its introduction last year.

Continue reading this story with a free account

Log in or register
Sign up for more articles like this
Subscribe to Bisnow's San Francisco Newsletters
Related Stories

Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac Rewrite Underwriting Standards For NYC's Rent Freeze

RealPage Antitrust Case Ends With Nearly $360M In Settlements For Renters

ZOM Living Entity Files For Bankruptcy To Fund Fight To Overturn $323M Judgment

Golden Apartment Building Sells For $62M To Chicago Company

New Student Housing Towers Lease Up Quickly In University City, But Developers Can't Build More

Nord Group's Lawyer Moves To Quit, Says Entities Can't Pay Him

Orchard Partners Selects JLL To Market 892K SF Manufacturing Campus In Brisbane: The San Francisco Deal Sheet

Housing Completions Close To 40,000 As LDA Adds Major Site And CEO Departs

Voorhees Greenlights 178-Unit Office-To-Resi Conversion Amid Multifamily Boom

Battered Mortgage REIT Suspends Dividend To Preserve Cash

Tyko Capital Sets New Record For Florida's Largest Construction Loan

Hof Wonen Acquires 251 Social Rental Houses In New Mixed-Use Project In The Hague