New York State Court Of Appeals Won’t Hear Opposition To Two Bridges Development Project

Two Bridges In Manhattan
Two Bridges In Manhattan

A group of developers is one step closer to building four new towers on the Lower East Side of Manhattan.

A tumultuous, years-long legal saga over a proposed development project in the Two Bridges neighborhood reached a turning point this week as the New York State Court of Appeals refused to hear a case aiming to halt the project, Crain’s New York reported.

In 2018, JDS Development Group, Starrett Development, L&M Development Partners and CIM Group received approval from the city to build a total of 2,775 apartments, including around 700 affordable units, across four skyscrapers at 259 Clinton St., 260 South St. and 247 Cherry St.

But community groups, such as Tenants United Fighting for the Lower East Side and Lower East Side Organized Neighbors, soon after filed lawsuits against the developers, asking a judge to pause the project and require the proposal to go through the city’s official land use process, ULURP,  to examine more closely the impact that the development would have on the neighborhood, Curbed reported at the time.

Supreme Court of New York Justice Arthur Engoron stopped the project, saying that the city council should be allowed to weigh in.

Earlier this year, the Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division overruled the judge’s decision. The Court of Appeals' choice to not hear the community group’s case serves as an endpoint for these suits, Crain’s reported.

This is the latest in a series of legal battles over land use and development this year. The Industry City rezoning was killed in the fall after City Council Member Carlos Menchaca, the local member for Sunset Park, said he would vote against it.

The court ruled in favor of the Inwood rezoning last year as well, ending a legal challenge by community members against the land use decision. In each of these cases, opponents of developments argued that the projects would make the area unaffordable for those who live there and lead to displacement.

Continue reading this story with a free account

Log in or register
Sign up for more articles like this
Subscribe to Bisnow's New York Newsletters
Related Stories

SpaceX Sues Texas AG, Grimes County Over Terafab Project Information

25 Years After 9/11, Lower Manhattan Is Finally Firing On All Cylinders

Tishman Speyer Seeks $92M Tax Break For Next Hudson Yards Office Tower

SL Green Selling SoHo Building For $226M

Retail Dynasty Pushes Button On Pair Of London Coliving Schemes

Innovo On Leasing Spree At Multistory LIC Warehouse: The N.Y. Deal Sheet

1,300 Projects Potentially Paused Due To Suspension Of Quality Inspectors

EXCLUSIVE: Georgia-Pacific Scraps Conversion Plans For Its Atlanta HQ

Mamdani Administration Applauds Transfer Of 3 Distressed Rent-Stabilized Buildings

What New York Can Learn From California's Push To Cut Environmental Red Tape

Miami Is 'Desperate' For A New Office Tower. It's About To Get 2

Sea Wall Rehabilitation: Strengthening Hudson River Walkway For Next 100 Years