Anything Goes? Skyscraper Policy Confusion As Developers Prepare Towering Prospects For Birmingham BTR

birmingham jewellery quarter
Courtesy of Siddall Jones Commercial Property Consultancy

Moda Living’s plans for a 39-storey Birmingham build-to-rent apartment tower have been slated for approval, despite the council admitting the scheme breaches its own planning policy, and despite a blistering thumbs down from Historic England.

The move, in the historic Jewellery Quarter, comes just weeks after planners appeared to suggest that even five storeys was too tall for the conservation area and as Birmingham’s now 17-year-old tall buildings policy awaits a review.

The Moda application is for a roughly 2-acre site at Great Charles Street, Ludgate Hill, Lionel Street and Livery Street within the Jewellery Quarter Conservation Area. There will be 722 private rental apartments in three blocks rising to 39 storeys.

An official report to Birmingham city councillors confesses that “the development proposal would be contrary to the development plan, having regard to section 38(6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004”.

It adds that the proposals conflict with policies to protect Birmingham’s heritage assets and “that development affecting a designated or non-designated heritage asset or its setting, will be expected to make a positive contribution to its character, appearance and significance. Much of the lower scale development proposed would not cause harm to heritage assets but the height of the tower in particular is considered to cause” a risk, the report states.

Much of the problem is caused by a tall buildings policy that was written in 2003 and existing local plans that suggest buildings in the area should be no more than 15 storeys and should not be in conservation areas.

The scheme is inside one conservation area (Jewellery Quarter) and close to the northern boundary of another (Colmore Row) and the report said that it risks some harm to heritage buildings, which abound in the vicinity including the grade II-listed public toilets within Snow Hill Railway Arch.

Historic England has objected to a proposal of “such colossal height and scale” and said it was “gravely concerned at the impact this large scale development would have on the Jewellery Quarter Conservation Area” and on historic buildings, including the city’s cathedral. Historic England noted the building would be nearly twice that of the neighbouring Snow Hill developments “which, even at their 20 storeys, have a considerable presence”.

However, the scheme was recommended for approval, despite these problems, on the basis of its economic contribution and new housing need.

Continue reading this story with a free account

Log in or register
Sign up for more articles like this
Subscribe to Bisnow's Birmingham Newsletters
Related Stories

Dublin BTR Had A €1B Summer

Canadian Firm Raises £680M For 6,000-Home UK BTR Push

IRES Set To Step Up Acquisition Pace With €115M-Plus BTR Deal

Kennedy Wilson In Pole Position For £750M Rented Resi Portfolio

Billionaire Buys Into BTR With £150M Deal

IRES Looks To More Forward Funding As Resi Market Gathers Pace

Investor Launching $100M BTR Fund To Capitalize On Opportunity From Housing Bill

New Housing Law To Send Institutional Investors Flocking To Build-To-Rent

Federal Housing Bill Becomes Law Without Trump's Signature

To Be Great, BTR Needs To Be Mid, Greystar Says

'We've Taken Control Of Our Destiny': QuadReal Unveils Plan For BTR Growth

RLAM Closes In On 1,000 BTR Units After New Acquisitions