D.C. Landlords To Pay $10M, Cease Operations In Historic Voucher Discrimination Settlement

Brian Frosh Karl Racine
Bisnow/Jon Banister
Maryland Ag Brian Frosh And D.c. Ag Karl Racine At A 2017 Press Conference

A trio of related D.C. real estate firms will be required to pay $10M in what Attorney General Karl Racine said is the largest penalty in a housing discrimination case in U.S. history.

Racine's office announced the $10M settlement Thursday with three firms — Daro Management Services, Daro Realty and Infinity Real Estate — that will also permanently ban the companies and their principals from managing residential real estate in D.C.

Daro Management operates and leases about 1,200 apartments across 15 Northwest D.C. buildings, the majority of which are owned by Daro Realty. New York-based Infinity oversees the practices of the other two entities, and it manages thousands of urban apartments, according to the Office of the Attorney General.

OAG sued the entities and several of their executives in 2020 for violations of civil rights and consumer protection laws. The lawsuit claimed they discriminated against renters who receive federal Section 8 housing vouchers and other forms of rental assistance and made it more difficult for them to rent apartments.

An email from one of the defendants released by OAG included the line: "No voucher/sec-8 – find ways to reject."

The settlement requires Daro to dissolve the property management arm of its business and transfer management of all the properties it owns to a third-party company within 18 months. It permanently bars all defendants from owning any interest in a property management company in the District. Additionally, Daro Management President and principal broker Carissa Barry must forfeit her real estate license for 15 years.

Around 11,500 low-income households in D.C. use Section 8 vouchers, according to OAG, which said 95% of the city's voucher holders are Black and 79% of households using vouchers are headed by women.

“This landmark resolution is a major victory for D.C. residents," Racine said in a release. "This case should send a strong message that if you break the law and discriminate against renters who use housing subsidies, you will face serious consequences."

Continue reading this story with a free account

Log in or register
Sign up for more articles like this
Subscribe to Bisnow's Washington, D.C. Newsletters
Related Stories

Suburban D.C. County Weighs Microhousing As Affordability Salve

Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac Rewrite Underwriting Standards For NYC's Rent Freeze

RealPage Antitrust Case Ends With Nearly $360M In Settlements For Renters

ZOM Living Entity Files For Bankruptcy To Fund Fight To Overturn $323M Judgment

Golden Apartment Building Sells For $62M To Chicago Company

New Student Housing Towers Lease Up Quickly In University City, But Developers Can't Build More

Nord Group's Lawyer Moves To Quit, Says Entities Can't Pay Him

Salesforce Plans Innovation Hub Downtown: The D.C. Deal Sheet

Housing Completions Close To 40,000 As LDA Adds Major Site And CEO Departs

Voorhees Greenlights 178-Unit Office-To-Resi Conversion Amid Multifamily Boom

Battered Mortgage REIT Suspends Dividend To Preserve Cash

Master Plan Is Underway For Southwest D.C., Chief Federal Planner Says