Under State Pressure, Fairfax To Approve Controversial 243-Unit Apartment Complex

The California Department of Housing and Community Development will compel the city of Fairfax to move forward with approvals for a controversial new 243-unit apartment building, the San Francisco Chronicle reported.

Opponents of the project won't be able to file lawsuits against the project under the California Environmental Quality Act.

Fairfax site of new apartment complex
95 Broadway In Fairfax, California, Will Be Redeveloped Into Housing.

The building is slated for a hillside location on the edge of Fairfax, on the site of the former Frogs Hot Tubs complex at 95 Broadway. The developer, Mill Creek Residential, pitched the project as a major opportunity for the city to achieve state-mandated housing requirements.

Fairfax is required to build 490 new housing units by 2031, under the state’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation process, which requires all local governments to adequately plan to meet housing needs. Failure to comply risks the loss of state funding and local control of land use.

The project will move forward in one of the Bay Area’s most gentrified submarkets, where housing prices have skyrocketed along with barriers to building new units. No new units were delivered in Marin County in the first half of 2025, according to CBRE.

Those barriers are set to become a little easier to overcome with the passage of Senate Bill 79, which requires upzoning for more housing density near transit. It also streamlines the permitting process. This follows major changes to CEQA earlier this year.

Those reforms, initially sponsored by Assembly Member Buffy Wicks, of Oakland, and state Sen. Scott Wiener, of San Francisco, are designed to speed up housing construction by exempting certain projects from the environmental review process. Infill housing projects that meet local zoning, density and objective planning standards are among those that qualify for exemption.

Critics of CEQA, enacted in 1970, have argued it has long complicated efforts to address the state’s housing crisis with a time-consuming environmental review process and the risk of legal exposure. It has become a tool for opponents to block development projects for any number of reasons.

The state’s ruling on the Fairfax project closes the door to any remaining challenges on environmental grounds.

Continue reading this story with a free account

Log in or register
Sign up for more articles like this
Subscribe to Bisnow's San Francisco Newsletters
Related Stories

RealPage Antitrust Case Ends With Nearly $360M In Settlements For Renters

ZOM Living Entity Files For Bankruptcy To Fund Fight To Overturn $323M Judgment

Golden Apartment Building Sells For $62M To Chicago Company

New Student Housing Towers Lease Up Quickly In University City, But Developers Can't Build More

Nord Group's Lawyer Moves To Quit, Says Entities Can't Pay Him

Orchard Partners Selects JLL To Market 892K SF Manufacturing Campus In Brisbane: The San Francisco Deal Sheet

Housing Completions Close To 40,000 As LDA Adds Major Site And CEO Departs

Voorhees Greenlights 178-Unit Office-To-Resi Conversion Amid Multifamily Boom

Battered Mortgage REIT Suspends Dividend To Preserve Cash

Tyko Capital Sets New Record For Florida's Largest Construction Loan

Hof Wonen Acquires 251 Social Rental Houses In New Mixed-Use Project In The Hague

Foundry Robotics Leaves San Francisco For New East Bay HQ