Greystar To Pay $1.4M In Settlement Over Military Members' Lease Termination Fees

Greystar's Office At 465 Meeting St. In South Carolina

Greystar has agreed to pay $1.4M to settle allegations by the Justice Department that U.S. service members given relocation orders were unlawfully charged lease termination fees.

According to the DOJ, the U.S.'s largest property management company "relied on software that it knew would automatically impose early termination charges" on military personnel protected by the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act. These third-party platforms include RealPage, Yardi and Entrata.

Charges ranged from several hundred to several thousand dollars. Some of the fees were imposed in the form of tenant discount chargebacks for rent concessions. Greystar employees were told to reverse the automatic charges by hand, but that execution was inconsistent, the filing alleged.

Greystar, which manages 800,000 properties, denied that it violated any laws.

As part of the settlement agreement, the company has six months to move all residential properties it manages to software platforms that don’t impose early termination charges on service members. Greystar also agreed to not charge military personnel fees if they lawfully end their lease.

The company has 30 days to come up with lease termination rules in compliance with the SCRA and must annually train employees on the guidelines after the U.S. approves them.

The DOJ’s suit isn’t the only litigation Greystar has been involved in this year, as the FTC brought forth a lawsuit Jan. 16 alleging the landlord charged tenants hidden fees for services like pest control and background checks.

RealPage’s algorithm-based rent-setting software has been the subject of over 30 rent collusion suits, which were rolled into one in August 2023. That case with the FTC is ongoing.

Some states have taken action against RealPage’s software in tandem with the DOJ. North Carolina, Colorado, California, Washington, Connecticut, Minnesota, Tennessee and Oregon’s August federal antitrust suit claims the company lets landlords conspire to inflate prices.

Philadelphia passed legislation to ban rent-setting software altogether in October, and several localities are on the same path, including San Jose, California, and New Jersey. New Jersey would be the first state to successfully ban the platforms, as legislation proposed in Colorado was struck down in May.

Continue reading this story with a free account

Log in or register
Sign up for more articles like this
Subscribe to Bisnow's National Newsletters
Related Stories

Wall Street Impatient For Big Tech Returns On Data Center Spending

As AI Adoption Ramps Up, Half A Million Property Managers Are In The Crosshairs

Treasuries Hover Around 4.7% As Wall Street Questions If Warsh Is A 'Dove In Hawk's Clothing'

Avison Young Had Assets Frozen By Bank Over Unpaid Taxes

Camden Property Trust Sells West Coast Portfolio, Clears $1.5B Target

Churchill Downs Plans To Sell 9 Casinos, Focus On Horse Racing

Bringing Stability And Savings To CRE Insurance Through Working Layer

More Hotel Owners In Need Of Cash Are Getting It From The Big Brands

Former Arms Dealer Targeting Heartland Apartment Takeover Files For Bankruptcy

SEC Charges REIT, Its Founders With Alleged $152M Fraud Scheme

Equinix Ramps Up Spending Plans Amid Faster-Than-Expected AI Shift

Cortland, Pulte, INVH, Walker & Dunlop Execs Talk Changing Demographics, AI