Measure ULA Carve-Outs Could Reduce Tax's Revenue By Up To 35% Annually, City Report Says

An Under-Construction Apartment Project On The Outskirts Of Downtown Los Angeles.

The carve-outs to Measure ULA that the city is mulling could translate to the roughly 3-year-old real estate transfer tax generating up to 35% less revenue annually, a city report found.

The figure comes from a Los Angeles Housing Department report, submitted over the weekend, that looks at four different situations that have been suggested as tweaks to the measure and estimates how their outcomes will affect the money generated by the tax.

ULA adds a 4% tax on transactions of more than $5.3M and a 5.5% tax on transactions over $10.6M.

LAHD's analysis found that exempting commercial and multifamily properties built or substantially remodeled within the past 15 years from the city's so-called mansion tax could reduce revenue from the measure by as much as 29%, or $145M, per year.

Exempting only commercial and multifamily projects built in the last 15 years would cause an estimated 13% drop in revenue, or $64M, per year, the report's authors said.

Creating a carve-out for residential properties impacted by the Palisades fire would reduce revenue by $32M, or 6%, annually while in effect. Restricting the carve-out to just those homes destroyed by the fire would mean a 2%, or $8M, annual drop in revenue for ULA while in effect.

Mayor Karen Bass last year suggested a three-year pause on ULA for "owners of homes, condominiums and other residential housing whose ownership was affected" by the Palisades fire in the fall.

A combination of the "broadest exemption scenarios" that includes transactions on 15-year-old commercial and multifamily properties as well as pauses for fire-impacted areas could reduce total revenue by about 35%, or a decrease of roughly $177M in ULA revenue each year, the report's authors said.

There are also possible revenue losses from interest and fees on ULA loans and other collateral reductions that could occur, according to the report, but weren’t included in the estimates.

The report is the result of a January request from Councilmembers Ysabel Jurado and Eunisses Hernandez, who said it was "critical to understand  the fiscal, programmatic, and operational impacts" of the changes the council was considering before they voted on them.

Measure ULA passed with 57.8% of votes in November 2022 and went into effect in April 2023. It has come under fire as critics, including those in the real estate industry and academics, have argued that it is discouraging new apartment production and commercial real estate transactions.

Measure ULA has been slower to hit estimated revenue targets than previously anticipated but passed the $1B revenue mark in January. Those funds have been used for a wide array of public benefits and tenant advocacy programs, including funding for affordable housing and eviction defense.

Continue reading this story with a free account

Log in or register
Sign up for more articles like this
Subscribe to Bisnow's Los Angeles Newsletters
Related Stories

JBG Smith Says Loss Is Improbable From $356M Wardman Tower Ruling

USA Properties Fund, Irvine Co. Break Ground On 338 Tustin Apartments: The Los Angeles Deal Sheet

Global Ad Agency Innocean Leases 101K SF At Hackman El Segundo Campus

Orders To Vacate On The Rise, Leaving Tenants With No Home, No Timeline

Fannie Mae Latest Lender Suing Alan Stalcup To Collect 'Bad Boy' Guarantee

Chicago's Apartment Pipeline Is Slowing, But This Lender Bets On Rehab Instead

$1.1B Loan To Hudson Pacific, Blackstone Moves To Special Servicing

Post Brothers Looks To Sell 2 Philly Apartment Buildings

The World Cup Boosted LA Hotel Rates. Occupancy Barely Budged

Pablo Castro's Lawyers Quit HueHub Suit, Citing 'Irreconcilable Differences'

Tishman Speyer Makes Charlotte Debut With $76.3M Apartment Buy

Keith Oden To Retire From Executive Position At Camden Property Trust